Promoting Blockchain & Web3 Innovation: Introducing the Florida DAO Bill (concept)
Unlocking the Potential of Web3: The Importance of Legal Recognition for Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) in Florida
As Web3 and blockchain technology continue to fuel a thriving new age industry, leaders in policy and practice are seeking to champion Web3-friendly political officials and policy makers who believe in unlocking the technology’s full potential.
As a Florida attorney (and having watched Web-3 grow all over the world), I think that Florida is uniquely poised to provide a “laboratory of experimentation” and spark a fire that unleashes true decentralized technology and infrastructure for humanity.
The Importance of DAOs
In accordance with our non-profit’s purpose, I am proposing a bill to appropriately recognize Decentralized Autonomous Organizations as legal entities in Florida and hopefully solve some of the legal ambiguities that are poised by many Web-3 Builders and entrepreneurs that are focused on building core technology infrastructure.
As of now, Web3 companies typically opt to register as nonprofit organizations overseas due to the perceived risk of issuing tokens in connection with a “for profit” entity. This has only served to send resources out of the United States/Florida and consequently lower the amount of revenue potentially collected by the government with relevant filing/organizational fees and potentially even tax revenue. To be clear, I have always been a proponent of encouraging Web-3 entrepreneurs to come up with legal strategy and nexus in the US, but it remains the industry perception that protocols can potentially avoid onerous regulations (or perhaps mitigate such nexus of the federal government) by incorporating off-shore or excluding U.S. citizens at all from participating in certain Web-3 projects. This is a sad state of affairs from a policy perspective and we are indirectly and (unconsciously through failure to act), pushing Web-3 companies to other jurisdictions. Of course, I think the US has some of the best minds in Web-3: Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase and Sam Bankman-Fried, Founder of FTX, have done a tremendous amount for the industry. However, we cannot expect them to do all the heavy lifting at the state and federal level.
We hope to create a jurisdiction where software innovation can flourish under self-governance; allowing a DAO to register as an LLC or corporation and providing liability even in the absence of incorporation will create a safe haven for open-source software innovators who are working for the public good.
Sunshin3 co-founder Gary Sheng, a named Forbes’ 30 Under 30 entrepreneur and Web3 innovator, is a prime example of the community members we are working towards attracting. Sheng is also co-founder of Civics Unplugged, a non-profit ecosystem empowering the next generation of leaders with the training, funding, and community needed to become civic innovators. Sheng echoes the importance of this bill: "DAOs are a novel type of organization that will help people accomplish goals and advance society in ways that traditional organizational structures won't. It's important that states understand this. I am encouraged by the openness by the legislators and regulators I have spoken to in Florida." We hope that this bill will encourage more projects like Civics Unplugged, and unlock other entrepreneurial potential that may be stifled by regulatory uncertainty.
Legislation Recommendations
While the draft is not complete, these are the five core concepts as of now:
Defining the DAO: A “Decentralized Autonomous Organization” (“DAO”) is any “automated transaction” or “smart contract” consisting of two or more individuals, algorithms, or smart contracts responsible for executing transactions from any given blockchain smart contract wallet.
Liability: No DAO member or participant, smart contract, algorithm, or wallet shall be liable to any other DAO member or participant, smart contract, algorithm, or wallet.
Entity Structure: A DAO may register as a Corporation or Limited Liability Company, so long as the Articles of Incorporation or Organization reflect the smart contract that confers DAO participation and governance rights upon the member, participant, smart contract, algorithm, or wallet.
Conflict: In the event of a conflict between Florida Law and the governance mechanics of the DAO, the governance mechanics procedures of the DAO will supersede.
Capital Raising: A DAO may raise unlimited amounts of capital, so long as the DAO governance is reflected in a publicly identifiable way and relates to open-source software; provided, however, that any “off chain” transactions facilitated via traditional banks will require registration of the DAO in Florida as well as the posting of public financial statements. Such financial statements shall be subject to reasonable inspection rights by the Commissioner of the Secretary of State of Florida.
While staying consistent with the Sunshine Law, the bill acknowledges that a DAO can be unincorporated while still receiving liability protection. Samuel Armes, Sunshin3 co-founder and founder of the Florida Blockchain Business Association (“FBBA”) expressed his support for the bill saying, “John Montague’s proposed bill is based off sound logic and industry standard representing both comprehensive understanding and forward thinking. At a minimum, this bill will open good dialogue with the right stakeholders and law makers in Florida.”
It is important to note that these proposals are not actually a “bill,” but rather a gateway opportunity to discuss helpful language for a proposed bill and/or potential guidance from the Florida Secretary of State.
A Need for Reform
I am introducing this proposal during a prime and pivotal state of the digital asset industry. Now more than ever, policy makers are taking notice of the shortcomings in the current regulatory environment and calling for action. Most recently, Senator John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.) sent a letter to the SEC on October 13, 2022 urging them to issue a new regulatory framework for digital assets stating, “whatever the risks and benefits of these new assets might be, existing laws and regulations were not designed to deal with how digital assets are being used in the market.” In his letter he recommends that the SEC must clarify which digital assets qualify as securities and how to issue and register those that do, and establish explicit guidelines regarding disclosure requirements, registration for digital asset securities trading platforms, and the trading and custody of digital assets.
Hickenlooper believes that “Clear rules promote an environment where investors are protected; responsible financial innovation is enabled by providing clear rules-of-the-road to market participants; and investor confidence is built through stakeholder feedback.” My DAO bill intends to serve the same purpose.